Last year, publishers debated the impact of AI and fought book bans in US schools and libraries.

What if machines can be taught to think just as we do?

Scholarly publishers and service providers are pulling and pushing at traditions, opening doors, and introducing innovations.

We must not take for granted how critical these media activities are to the joy of celebrating our humanity and to the responsibility of sustaining our freedom.

Amazon has asked a federal judge to reject an FTC antitrust suit.

Critically for Richard Charkin, the title verso is where to find who is the copyright holder.

AAP responded to tech industry assertions that respect for copyright is an obstacle to their innovation by labeling that as, “nonsense.”

Books remain a dominant format, though reading and discussing stories, as well as the IP generated from books, have become integrated in consumers’ experiences and on publishers’ spreadsheets.

In Iowa, the ACLU and Lambda Legal are challenging a state law that critics say seeks to silence LGBTQ+ students and bans books with sexual or LGBTQ+ content.

In the rapidly developing world of AI uses and discussions, copyright issues are key.